• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

RVA Mag

Richmond, VA Culture & Politics Since 2005

Menu RVA Mag Logo
  • NEWS
  • MUSIC
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • EAT DRINK
  • PHOTO
  • WATCH
  • EVENTS
  • MAGAZINE
RVA Mag Logo
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Sponsors

French World Cup Victory: A Win For Diversity, Or a Slight Toward Immigrants?

Saffeya Ahmed | July 17, 2018

Topics: African studies, football, France, Immigration Rights, Islam, Muslims, race and racism, soccer, world cup

World Cup 2018 went out with a bang Sunday, as France took their second title home after an intense final against Croatia.

As an avid soccer player, the World Cup is the sporting tournament I look the most forward to. Every four years, I am completely absorbed in the games for a month, my eyes glued to the television rooting for my favorite teams. And this year, the winning team meant something a bit more special to me.

France’s national football team–nicknamed “Les Bleus” – made World Cup 2018 a victory in the name of diversity across the world. Of the 23-man squad, 19 players are immigrants or the sons of immigrants, 15 have roots in Africa, and seven are Muslim.

French Players and Their Origins

This year’s winners hold a special place in my heart. As a Muslim woman and the daughter of immigrants, seeing a squad of primarily immigrant, Muslim players take home the biggest title in the footballing world really hits home. I’ve seen players pray before the matches start and after scoring goals; it’s surreal to see them praying through every moment of their lives, as I do.

How I feel seeing Les Bleus win is similar to how I felt seeing Ibtihaj Muhammad compete in the U.S. Olympics, being the first Muslim-American woman to wear the hijab while competing as a member of the U.S. fencing team. In a way, I saw a part of myself in her. And in a way, I see a part of myself in the French squad who were victorious Sunday.

In a current global community where immigrants, Muslims, and people of color are demonized nearly daily, it’s refreshing to see us celebrated. It’s invigorating to see so many people tracing back the roots of a team whose identities are typically treated with hostility. 

But that’s not to say this diverse team is a hallmark of France’s outstanding dedication to welcoming immigrants and embracing diversity. Despite how revitalizing it might seem to see such a multicultural team take home a huge win, it’s quite hypocritical on France’s behalf to claim Les Bleus as their own, when the country itself has banned Muslim women from wearing the hijab and burqa in public and disproportionately segregated ethnic minorities in public housing complexes in French suburban areas. France has a short history of immigration, only accepting major waves of immigrants over the last 80 years, but the country has deep roots in colonialism and a fierce sense of nationalism, driving racist and xenophobic policies.

Kylian Mbappe, 19, of Cameroon and Algerian Descent

France’s approach to its jarring racism and discrimination is that of color-blindness, also known as, doing nothing. French law prohibits the national census from disaggregating data by race or ethnicity; everyone is simply, French. And while everyone in the country is “French,” citizens who find ancestral roots in France absorb themselves in French nationalism so much to the point that the immigrant persona is that of an “outsider” in their country. Racism in France runs differently than in the U.S. because they believe an absence of color is the best way address the issue. But a color-blind approach is equivalent to ignoring the issue completely, and ignoring an issue prevents a solution from surfacing.

Now Les Bleus have conquered the World Cup–bringing a title home to a country that has not fully accepted them as Frenchmen to begin with. It is self-righteous to see France praise the members of their football team who would otherwise be treated as second-class citizens, if it were not for their ability to conquer the world’s most-watched sporting event.

The French national team made a similar stride their last World Cup victory, back in 1998. Twenty years ago, France arrived at the Cup with just as diverse of a team – captained by the brilliant Zinedine Zidane: a Muslim, Arab, and Frenchman. After the 1998 final against Brazil, commentators cheered that the French flag should be changed from blue, red and white to “black, blanc, et beur,” or “black, white and Arab.” But France’s win at the Cup in 1998 remained just that–its diverse team had no impact on the country’s ongoing grapple with embracing the immigrant persona.

Twenty years later, the French squad has done it again, arriving to Russia 2018 with a multicultural squad with the ability to unite a fractured nation struggling to accept immigrants they view as “outsiders.

Paul Pogba, Son of Guinean Parents and Muslim, Prays on the pitch.

I am elated to see a team like Les Bleus be victorious. But what disappoints me is that immigrants, Muslims, and people of color shouldn’t have to accomplish phenomenal feats to be treated as human or gain the respect and compassion of their home countries. We should be treated as humans simply because we are human. But instead, there’s something to prove, and there has to be a reason why we deserve respect and compassion–as if being human isn’t enough. It takes human dignity and turns it into a competition.

It takes human dignity and turns it into a competition.

Yet amongst the stormy political climate currently engulfing our global community, I see a glimmer of hope and promise in the results of World Cup 2018. It has been a long-winded journey towards a more inclusive, accepting world, but Sunday’s game was a way to bring us all together, despite any differences.

That’s the beauty in sports. These competitions are more than just games. The World Cup is more than just a title. For a few weeks, people from thousands of different backgrounds with millions of different stories come together for one sole reason: to enjoy the sport of football together. The French squad who took the Cup home Sunday are proof that immigrants don’t drain a country’s resources, they enrich its culture. And that’s a lesson every country must learn.

Opinion: An open letter from France to Virginia on history and Confederate statues

Alex Chabot | August 18, 2017

Topics: confederate statues, France, Open Letter, richmond, virginia

Dear Virginia,

I am from Virginia, but live abroad in Nice, France. I have been following the events in Charlottesville with growing concern. Angry mobs, domestic terrorism, equivocation from politicians, and the thought that those who don’t remember history are bound to repeat it.

Virginia is a beautiful place, green and lush, with rivers and rolling blue mountains giving way to a broad tidal plane before the magnificent Chesapeake Bay and the beaches of the Atlantic ocean. I get profoundly homesick just thinking about it. Should I die far from home, make sure I make it back to Nelson County, I want to be buried under a Tulip Poplar.

And my state has history. People hunted and fished there for thousands of years before the first Europeans came. People from Europe came in search of a better life, and they came to Virginia first — America was founded in Virginia. The last battle of the Revolutionary War was fought in Virginia. Eight US presidents were Virginians. It’s not a stretch to say we gave the rest of the world modern democracy with the Virginia Declaration of Rights, it’s a history to be proud of.

But history means nothing without context.

Virginia was built on the backs of slaves. In 1619 the first African slaves were kidnapped and brought as chattel to Virginia. For the next 245 years, Virginia participated in a system of human bondage that reduced millions of human beings to the most wretched state, revoking their humanity in the process, subjecting them to humiliations, to violence, and deprived them of all rights.

The same rights which we as members of an open and free society strive to make sure benefit everyone in equal measure today. Deprived of liberty for 245 years, families were broken up at the whims of a privileged class. For 245 years men were robbed of life and limb and worked until death, women were sexually abused, beaten, and forced into ignominious servitude for the benefit of only a few. For 245 years the pride, energy, and soul were sucked out of entire generations so that a few men in Virginia could profit.

There is no ending to the description by which humans sank in the pursuit of enslaving other humans. The innumerable indecencies that one set of humans inflicted on another continued de facto for another 100 years, until the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964.

We remember this in Virginia. We fought a war over it. We fought a war that killed more Americans than had ever been killed before or since. And when I say we, I mean Virginians. In 1861, Virginia voted to abrogate the Constitution and to secede from the Union because the federal government had gone too far in “having perverted [constitutional] powers, not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern slaveholding States.” That is history, not fiction.

Never let anyone tell you Virginia left the Union over some inconsequential question of state’s rights. Virginia left the Union in order to protect the institution of slavery, upon which its entire economy was built. Slaves built Virginia. They were driven to death in order to build its roads, its bridges, its buildings, its canals, and to work its fields. All economic riches were brought up from the earth through the sweat of men and women men who were owned by other men. The prospect of losing all that wealth was intolerable to the to the men who signed the Ordinance of Succession from The United States.

And then the blood flowed.

Of the 600,000 men who died in the Civil War, 30,000 of them were from Virginia. At Bull Run, Fredrericksburg, Chancellorsville, Richmond, The Wilderness, Spotslvania, Cold Harbor, Lynchburg, and Petersburg – for four years Virginia ran red with the blood of Americans.

We remember.

I love Virginia, and I love Richmond, but we have got a problem— those Confederate statues.

The statues that sparked the chaos and bloodshed in Charlottesville – they have to go. This isn’t erasing history; history is in books, in the memories of men and women who lived, and who died. We know a lot about history in Virginia, which is why the statue of General Robert E. Lee in Charlottesville has to be removed. The same goes for Richmond, the historic capital of the Confederacy. The statues of Lee, Stuart, Jackson, Maury, and Davis stand proud on treelined Monument Avenue – they cannot stay there.

After the Civil War, we know of the horror that cowards in hoods who stalked the land at night, instilling fear and terror in the hearts of Black Virginians. We know what happened in the daytime when the law wasn’t applied to all people equally; when one group of people can exact summary justice on another just because they want to.

We know history in Virginia.

We know what it means when justice does not apply to all in equal measure, what it means to live ‘separate but equal’, and the hatred and violence that comes with that bankrupt and hollow ethos. We know of the shame that is little boys and girls who grow up without the same opportunities as their neighbors because they are not from the privileged race.

We know history in Virginia.

We know what it means when people who love each other can’t be married because the color of their skin is different. We know what it means when white supremacy is allowed to run roughshod over the land with torches and nooses — we know history in Virginia. And we put an end to those disgraces because we believe in the idea that all people are created equal and that all people should have an equal chance to pursue life, liberty, and happiness.

Virginia, is not a place that was built on personalities or idols, but rather built on ideas that we, the people, are constantly and endlessly trying to realize. This will never  be embodied in statues. We have not always lived up to those ideas but our history is one of struggle, of strength, and of progression. Yet here we are, in 2017, with Virginians dying in the fight against white supremacists.

Those white supremacists do not respect the principled ideas that the Commonwealth was founded on, but rather stone and iron — the statues of long dead men, traitors, and insurgents that fought to preserve the system of human bondage we revile today.

Perhaps those statues could have stood and gathered moss and reminded men and women what happens when human greed and arrogance cause us to forget that all people are made equal. Perhaps those statues could have stood and served as solemn memorials for all those who died for the benefit of a few and who were hurdled into oblivion by men who believed they were a superior race. But they haven’t.

Instead, like the Confederate battle flag, they became the totems of white supremacy. Those who know history understand the dark things which were done under the cover of those symbols. They are things that no Virginian— indeed no American— can ever tolerate. The suggestion that Confederate statues on Monument Avenue be removed won’t be easy for some people to accept.

But they’ll endure because we know history in Virginia.

In order to preserve history I suggest that Belle Isle, the site of a civil war prison, be turned into an open air museum dedicated to telling the story of American slavery – in the style of the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC. The statues should go there, so people can see them and learn the most accurate version of the history in Virginia and the US. They can learn about the millions of people who were taken from their homes and forced into slavery. They can learn about the horrors of the Atlantic passage that brought them here. They can learn about what it meant for men and women to live as chattel. They can learn about the economy built on the backs of men of women, at the point of guns, with whips and chains, but who yearned for freedom and dreamed of the day where they would be accorded the rights we take for granted.

Then people can also learn about the underground railroad and fugitive slave laws, about three-fifths compromises and the craven Virginia politicians who did not stand up for what is right. They can go there to learn about heroes, too: about Harriet Tubman, about abolitionists like John Brown, Lucretia Mott, and Frederick Douglass. They can learn about the Virginian slave revolts led by Nat Turner and Gabriel Prosser. They can learn about that terrible war, and those men who renounced their oaths to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic to protect the institution of slavery.

And in the end, they can learn about the historical propaganda of the Confederate Lost Cause that has led us to this point in history. The myth of gallantry and the veil of Southern genteelness that was used to rewrite history after the war and led generations of people to believe that this kind of heritage and culture should be protected, while they carry torches and salute supremacists in our streets. They can learn about how racism poisoned reconstruction, about Jim Crow and why those statues were erected—not to preserve history, but to re-write it, mythologizing a tragic end to a tragic war — and about the bitter heritage that we all live with today because of it.

They can learn about it all in Virginia because we know history.

Yours Faithfully,

Alex Chabot

sidebar

sidebar-alt