Kyle’s Criterion Corner: The River (1951)

by | May 18, 2015 | FILM & TV

Based on Rumer Godden’s novel of the same name, The River stands as a pillar for French filmmaker’s Jean Renoir’s later often overlooked work.

Based on Rumer Godden’s novel of the same name, The River stands as a pillar for French filmmaker’s Jean Renoir’s later often overlooked work. It’s a film that combines a coming of age story, nostalgia, docudrama, and respectful dedication to a backdrop of India into a single story about three girls and their newfound infatuation with an American soldier.

Harriet, a teenage girl who carries a book of her own writing and poetry, is our main character for the duration. Her future-self narrates the film. Despite her English middle-class household and upbringing, she is not sure where she fits in her world, and the privileged setting provides a deep contrast to her native Indian surroundings and their own traditions.

The object of affection, Captain John, is simply a leftover of “the war” with no particular designation that has left him with a prosthetic leg. He is transplanted to this unfamiliar setting with little to do except fall in love and find purpose. The irony being that only in India is Captain John as exotic as he is.

Also vying for his attention also is Harriet’s best friend, the beautiful and older Valerie, and the meek Melanie who is of mixed heritage and even more worldly. Pairing Harriet’s close friends as romantic rivals is nothing new in storytelling, but in Renoir’s work it becomes a much more furtive story rather than insipid teenage yearning.

The River was Renoir’s first foray into Technicolor and it’s impressive; often showcasing the Indian landscape with a grounded, dream-like decorum and buoyant sensuality.

Instead of filling the world with lions and elephants, as Renoir was conscious of not doing, he instead intended to show the India he had observed and admired during his own visits. Choosing to highlight the beautiful stylistic contrasts of colors and vibrant life of those working and living around the riverbed rather than follow the typical Hollywood route of an exotic fantasy picture.

The timeframe is never precisely given but often feels typical of the 1920s post-war (the semi-autobiographical novel reflects this) and it is only mentioned in passing that some war had occurred somewhere.

These unspecific out-of-time qualities aided the film to the appeal of the dream-like feel of memory and past reflections.

The River may be less sophisticated than Renoir’s previous films, with less camera moves and easier subject matter, but it is still beloved by many of his admirers for it’s tender portrayal of humanity through his memorable characters.

The dash of variety worked to diversify Renoir’s catalogue and makes an excellent Blu-ray upgrade choice for Criterion.

Included in the release is a featurette of Martin Scorsese talking about the influence and love for the film, an enlightening introduction featuring Renoir talking about his undertaking of the film, an audio interview with producer Ken McEldowney, along with two documentaries on the film’s production.

One of the more fascinating details about the film’s production was its financing came from a Beverly Hills florist who was so dissatisfied by Hollywood movies. The florist’s wife dared him to do one better, so he sold his shop, became a producer, shopped around, and this was one of the films he worked on and was an actual success.

It was this kind of outsider thinking that allowed Renoir to construct the film to his liking and not following the clichés that were usually implemented in films such as these. The new Blu-ray release also comes with a fold-out leaflet with an essay, “A New Authenticity,” by Ian Christie, and “Notes on The River,” along with some production notes by Renoir himself.

After its publication in 1946, Godden’s novel The River received an ecstatic review in The New Yorker magazine calling it one of the best novels you’ll never read.

Renoir, not quite sure where to go in his career, came across the review, read the book, and wanted to make the movie an ode to India. The film’s use of color is magnificent and almost low-key at times. It’s radiant look and colorful aesthetic is very much a dreamy representation of India that never feels surreal, but rather enchanted. A lot of the actors weren’t well known and merely amateurs, helping to convey this sense of otherworld setting because of their anonymity.

Renoir was great at letting the look and lushness of the film and drive the senses and fill gaps of a story that is pure melodrama. While the ages of the girls never seem to be a big problem, it’s Harriet’s infatuation with an older man that never seems truly realistic in hindsight.

Rather than feeling bad for the misguided young woman coming of age and longing for her first kiss, it’s conveyed to something more unfortunate despite that actual fruition might actually evoke in the viewer. Captain John is just never meant to be for Harriet and we know this before even she does, but it’s her sensitive longing that drives the film.

Eventually the love triangle the film forms between Harriet, Captain John, and Valerie is a false one, but it still feels engaging and heartfelt. Harriet and Captain John still have affection despite their forlorn circumstances, and it is a powerful lesson in emotional maturity.

It is the downstream flowing of life’s inevitable growing pains that are the most insightful revelations come from a beautiful film like The River.

The River
1951 (France)
Director: Jean Renoir
Spine #276
Criterion Collection Blu-Ray, DVD, and Hulu-Plus

Kyle Shearin

Kyle Shearin

Powered by coffee, Kyle Shearin is a regular contributor for RVAmag for better part of the decade. Mr. Shearin studied journalism/film at VCU while eventually graduating from the University of Mary Washington with a B.A. in English Lit. Started KCC (Kyle's Criterion Corner) in 2015. Probably likes a lot of the same stuff you do.




more in art

Review | BLKS is a Mixed Bag at Richmond Triangle Players

I often come off like a chihuahua on sugar pills when reviewing plays for this magazine. I am excitable, yes, but never in the service of idle flattery. I also take no joy in being critical of people’s hard work. I’ve said this whole thing before several times, but I...

Review | Dog Mom is Theatre at Its Best, Here or Anywhere Else

There are days of doing this when I just get to gush. Today is one of those days.  I have had the pleasure this past year of witnessing some of the best theatre of my life. VA Rep’s Primary Trust floored me. Richmond Shakespeare continued their epic run of hits...

Studio Two Three Is Beefing With Bots. Among Other Things

Studio Two Three has been around long enough to forget how likely it was to fail. Sixteen years ago, a small group of friends wanted to keep making art in Richmond. They pooled money from working in local restaurants to pay rent, borrowed equipment and built an...

Richmond Got a Little Filthier. John Waters Was Here.

Monday night I got taken to a church of filth. The Pope of Trash, the Prince of Puke, the Sultan of Sleaze, John Waters, graced the Byrd Theatre for a sold-out one-man show. The actor, writer and director became famous for cult classics like Pink Flamingos, Hairspray...

It’s Still Our City Ep. 24 | Ed Harrington

RVA Mag and NODDERLY presents It’s Still Our City, a podcast hosted by Harrison Christy and with Clair Morgan as co-host and producer through NODDERLY. "Ed Harrington moved to Richmond in 1993 to study art at VCU. At VCU, he was a Communication Arts major with a...

Review | Virginia Rep Gets Everything Wrong, and It’s Hilarious

Okay, I wasn’t prepared for the complete gut-busting insanity of The Play That Goes Wrong at Virginia Repertory Theatre’s November Theatre. Before heading to the Iron Blossom Festival this past Sunday, I caught a matinee. I didn’t know much about this play other than...